Cabo Verde vs Chile: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Cabo Verde
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 40,498 million SLC against 20.33 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 40,478 million SLC.
That makes Chile's figure about 1,992.0 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 1st and Chile ranks 5th of 1 groups.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.45 million SLC | 22,502 million SLC | 22,473 million SLC | Chile |
| 2010s | 2.39 million SLC | 16,887 million SLC | 16,885 million SLC | Chile |
| 2020s | 22.48 million SLC | 33,114 million SLC | 33,092 million SLC | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Cabo Verde or Chile?
- Chile, at 40,498 million SLC against 20.33 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Cabo Verde and Chile?
- 40,478 million SLC, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Chile?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Chile rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Cabo Verde ranks 1st and Chile ranks 5th of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.