Cabo Verde vs Egypt: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Cabo Verde
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 58,384 million SLC against 20.33 million SLC in Cabo Verde, a difference of 58,364 million SLC.
That makes Egypt's figure about 2,871.8 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.34 million SLC | 2,956 million SLC | 2,921 million SLC | Egypt |
| 2010s | 2.39 million SLC | 5,800 million SLC | 5,797 million SLC | Egypt |
| 2020s | 22.48 million SLC | 17,164 million SLC | 17,142 million SLC | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Cabo Verde or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 58,384 million SLC against 20.33 million SLC in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Cabo Verde and Egypt?
- 58,364 million SLC, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Egypt?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Egypt rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Cabo Verde ranks 1st and Egypt ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.