Chile vs Guinea: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Chile
- Guinea
How they compare
Chile currently reports 40,498 million SLC against 35,000 million SLC in Guinea, a difference of 5,498 million SLC.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Guinea ahead.
Chile ranks 5th and Guinea ranks 6th of 66 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 20,469 million SLC | 92,779 million SLC | 72,311 million SLC | Guinea |
| 2020s | 33,114 million SLC | 79,600 million SLC | 46,486 million SLC | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Chile or Guinea?
- Chile, at 40,498 million SLC against 35,000 million SLC in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Chile and Guinea?
- 5,498 million SLC, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guinea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Guinea rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Chile ranks 5th and Guinea ranks 6th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.