Colombia vs Mexico: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Colombia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 3,197 million SLC against 3,003 million SLC in Colombia, a difference of 194 million SLC.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Mexico ahead.
Colombia ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 14th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,162 million SLC | 3,709 million SLC | 546.86 million SLC | Mexico |
| 2020s | 8,138 million SLC | 3,067 million SLC | 5,070 million SLC | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Colombia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 3,197 million SLC against 3,003 million SLC in Colombia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Colombia and Mexico?
- 194 million SLC, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mexico?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Mexico rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Colombia ranks 15th and Mexico ranks 14th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.