Cuba vs Namibia: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Cuba
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 325 million SLC against 233.52 million SLC in Cuba, a difference of 91.48 million SLC.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Namibia ahead.
Cuba ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 31st of 68 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Cuba or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 325 million SLC against 233.52 million SLC in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Cuba and Namibia?
- 91.48 million SLC, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and Namibia rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Cuba ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 31st of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.