Guinea vs Russian Federation: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Guinea
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 49,693 million SLC against 35,000 million SLC in Guinea, a difference of 14,693 million SLC.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.4 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 66 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 94,062 million SLC | 39,206 million SLC | 54,856 million SLC | Guinea |
| 2020s | 114,550 million SLC | 48,173 million SLC | 66,377 million SLC | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Guinea or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 49,693 million SLC against 35,000 million SLC in Guinea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 14,693 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Russian Federation?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Guinea and Russian Federation rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Guinea ranks 6th and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.