Guyana vs Iceland: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Guyana
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2,458 million SLC against 1,334 million SLC in Guyana, a difference of 1,124 million SLC.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.8 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 16th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,304 million SLC | 622 million SLC | 682 million SLC | Guyana |
| 2020s | 1,372 million SLC | 1,982 million SLC | 609.56 million SLC | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Guyana or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2,458 million SLC against 1,334 million SLC in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Guyana and Iceland?
- 1,124 million SLC, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iceland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Iceland rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Guyana ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 16th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.