Republic of Korea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local

Republic of Korea
2.38 million million SLC
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
49,827 million SLC
in 2024
Republic of Korea rank
2nd
United Republic of Tanzania rank
2nd

Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time

  • Republic of Korea
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M200120122024

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 2.38 million million SLC against 49,827 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.33 million million SLC.

That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 47.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.

Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 66 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Korea United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 904,250 million SLC 6,099 million SLC 898,151 million SLC Republic of Korea
2010s 1.58 million million SLC 15,981 million SLC 1.56 million million SLC Republic of Korea
2020s 2.16 million million SLC 249,971 million SLC 1.91 million million SLC Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Republic of Korea or United Republic of Tanzania?
Republic of Korea, at 2.38 million million SLC against 49,827 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Republic of Korea and United Republic of Tanzania?
2.33 million million SLC, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and United Republic of Tanzania?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Republic of Korea and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
Republic of Korea ranks 2nd and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd of 66 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forestry-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/republic-of-korea/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/forestry-central-government-expenditure-value-standard-local-currency/republic-of-korea/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Korea vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 888 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.