Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Tonga: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Tonga
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 2.91 million SLC against 1.18 million SLC in Tonga, a difference of 1.73 million SLC.
That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 2.5 times Tonga's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 54th and Tonga ranks 57th of 66 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.58 million SLC | 0.8333 million SLC | 1.75 million SLC | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2020s | 2.91 million SLC | 1.18 million SLC | 1.73 million SLC | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Tonga?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 2.91 million SLC against 1.18 million SLC in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tonga?
- 1.73 million SLC, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tonga?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2020.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Tonga rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 54th and Tonga ranks 57th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.