United Republic of Tanzania vs Viet Nam: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- United Republic of Tanzania
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 509,000 million SLC against 49,827 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 459,173 million SLC.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 10.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 3 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Republic of Tanzania | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,638 million SLC | 245,822 million SLC | 236,185 million SLC | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 15,981 million SLC | 846,697 million SLC | 830,716 million SLC | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 23,477 million SLC | 567,667 million SLC | 544,190 million SLC | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local, United Republic of Tanzania or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 509,000 million SLC against 49,827 million SLC in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local between United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
- 459,173 million SLC, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do United Republic of Tanzania and Viet Nam rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- United Republic of Tanzania ranks 2nd and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 3 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.