Central African Republic vs Lebanon: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices over time
- Central African Republic
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.02 million USD against 0 million USD in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.02 million USD.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 59th and Lebanon ranks 57th of 66 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.79 million USD | 0.31 million USD | 6.48 million USD | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 7.94 million USD | 0.05 million USD | 7.89 million USD | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$, 2015 prices, Central African Republic or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 0.02 million USD against 0 million USD in Central African Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$, 2015 prices between Central African Republic and Lebanon?
- 0.02 million USD, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Lebanon?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Central African Republic and Lebanon rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$, 2015 prices?
- Central African Republic ranks 59th and Lebanon ranks 57th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.