Chile vs Slovak Republic: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Chile
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 78.38 million USD against 42.92 million USD in Chile, a difference of 35.46 million USD.
That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.8 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Slovak Republic ranks 12th of 66 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.31 million USD | 30.06 million USD | 12.25 million USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 20.16 million USD | 73.35 million USD | 53.2 million USD | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$, Chile or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 78.38 million USD against 42.92 million USD in Chile as of 2011.
- What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Chile and Slovak Republic?
- 35.46 million USD, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Slovak Republic?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Chile and Slovak Republic rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Chile ranks 16th and Slovak Republic ranks 12th of 66 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.