Cuba vs Sweden: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Cuba
233.52 million USD
in 2019
Sweden
113.08 million USD
in 2024
Cuba rank
7th
Sweden rank
10th

Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Cuba
  • Sweden
050100150200250200920162024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 233.52 million USD against 113.08 million USD in Sweden, a difference of 120.44 million USD.

That makes Cuba's figure about 2.1 times Sweden's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 10th of 68 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$, Cuba or Sweden?
Cuba, at 233.52 million USD against 113.08 million USD in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Cuba and Sweden?
120.44 million USD, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sweden?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cuba and Sweden rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Cuba ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 10th of 68 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 888 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.