Grenada vs Vanuatu: Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Grenada
0.36 million USD
in 2024
Vanuatu
0.58 million USD
in 2016
Grenada rank
57th
Vanuatu rank
55th

Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Grenada
  • Vanuatu
0.20.40.60.8200420142024

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 0.58 million USD against 0.36 million USD in Grenada, a difference of 0.22 million USD.

That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.6 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Grenada ranks 57th and Vanuatu ranks 55th of 68 countries.

Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$, Grenada or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 0.58 million USD against 0.36 million USD in Grenada as of 2016.
What is the difference in forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Grenada and Vanuatu?
0.22 million USD, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Vanuatu?
5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2016.
How do Grenada and Vanuatu rank globally for forestry (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Grenada ranks 57th and Vanuatu ranks 55th of 68 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forestry (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
70 places, 888 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.