Albania vs Angola: Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Albania
- Angola
How they compare
Albania currently reports 1,345 million SLC against 1,221 million SLC in Angola, a difference of 124 million SLC.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 12th and Angola ranks 13th of 33 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Angola | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,134 million SLC | 22.05 million SLC | 1,112 million SLC | Albania |
| 2020s | 1,458 million SLC | 692.98 million SLC | 765.35 million SLC | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local, Albania or Angola?
- Albania, at 1,345 million SLC against 1,221 million SLC in Angola as of 2022.
- What is the difference in forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local between Albania and Angola?
- 124 million SLC, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Angola?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Albania and Angola rank globally for forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Albania ranks 12th and Angola ranks 13th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.