Egypt vs Kazakhstan: Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Egypt
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 58,384 million SLC against 20,978 million SLC in Kazakhstan, a difference of 37,406 million SLC.
That makes Egypt's figure about 2.8 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 4th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 33 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,324 million SLC | 4,213 million SLC | 889.32 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 4,985 million SLC | 14,880 million SLC | 9,895 million SLC | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local, Egypt or Kazakhstan?
- Egypt, at 58,384 million SLC against 20,978 million SLC in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local between Egypt and Kazakhstan?
- 37,406 million SLC, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Egypt and Kazakhstan rank globally for forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Egypt ranks 4th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.