Egypt vs Myanmar: Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Egypt
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 328,877 million SLC against 58,384 million SLC in Egypt, a difference of 270,493 million SLC.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 5.6 times Egypt's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 2nd of 33 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,993 million SLC | 88,865 million SLC | 85,872 million SLC | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 5,916 million SLC | 322,652 million SLC | 316,736 million SLC | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 11,559 million SLC | 328,877 million SLC | 317,318 million SLC | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local, Egypt or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 328,877 million SLC against 58,384 million SLC in Egypt as of 2020.
- What is the difference in forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local between Egypt and Myanmar?
- 270,493 million SLC, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Myanmar?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Egypt and Myanmar rank globally for forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Egypt ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 2nd of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.