Egypt vs Pakistan: Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Egypt
- Pakistan
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 58,384 million SLC against 42,869 million SLC in Pakistan, a difference of 15,515 million SLC.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.4 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Pakistan ahead.
Egypt ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 5th of 33 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6,719 million SLC | 14,117 million SLC | 7,398 million SLC | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 25,408 million SLC | 27,133 million SLC | 1,725 million SLC | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local, Egypt or Pakistan?
- Egypt, at 58,384 million SLC against 42,869 million SLC in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local between Egypt and Pakistan?
- 15,515 million SLC, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Pakistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Pakistan rank globally for forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Egypt ranks 4th and Pakistan ranks 5th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.