Egypt vs Russian Federation: Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Egypt
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 69,242 million SLC against 58,384 million SLC in Egypt, a difference of 10,858 million SLC.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 33 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6,719 million SLC | 54,927 million SLC | 48,208 million SLC | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 12,384 million SLC | 85,420 million SLC | 73,036 million SLC | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local, Egypt or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 69,242 million SLC against 58,384 million SLC in Egypt as of 2021.
- What is the difference in forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local between Egypt and Russian Federation?
- 10,858 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Russian Federation?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Egypt and Russian Federation rank globally for forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Egypt ranks 4th and Russian Federation ranks 3rd of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.