Pakistan vs Paraguay: Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Pakistan
- Paraguay
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 42,869 million SLC against 31,778 million SLC in Paraguay, a difference of 11,091 million SLC.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.3 times Paraguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 5th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 33 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14,276 million SLC | 27,129 million SLC | 12,853 million SLC | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 8,330 million SLC | 31,778 million SLC | 23,448 million SLC | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local, Pakistan or Paraguay?
- Pakistan, at 42,869 million SLC against 31,778 million SLC in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local between Pakistan and Paraguay?
- 11,091 million SLC, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Paraguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
- How do Pakistan and Paraguay rank globally for forestry (general government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Pakistan ranks 5th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.