El Salvador vs Samoa: Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard
Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard over time
- El Salvador
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 1.97 million SLC against 1.3 million SLC in El Salvador, a difference of 0.67 million SLC.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.5 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Samoa ahead.
El Salvador ranks 42nd and Samoa ranks 41st of 49 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.72 million SLC | 1.8 million SLC | 1.08 million SLC | Samoa |
| 2020s | 4.5 million SLC | 1.89 million SLC | 2.61 million SLC | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value standard, El Salvador or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 1.97 million SLC against 1.3 million SLC in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value standard between El Salvador and Samoa?
- 0.67 million SLC, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Samoa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Samoa rank globally for forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value standard?
- El Salvador ranks 42nd and Samoa ranks 41st of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.