Grenada vs Israel: Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Grenada
- Israel
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0.26 million USD against 0 million USD in Israel, a difference of 0.26 million USD.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 42nd and Israel ranks 44th of 49 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2913 million USD | 0 million USD | 0.2913 million USD | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.252 million USD | 0 million USD | 0.252 million USD | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$, Grenada or Israel?
- Grenada, at 0.26 million USD against 0 million USD in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Grenada and Israel?
- 0.26 million USD, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Israel?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Israel rank globally for forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Grenada ranks 42nd and Israel ranks 44th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.