Cuba vs Mexico: Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Cuba
114.94 million USD
in 2019
Mexico
174.65 million USD
in 2024
Cuba rank
4th
Mexico rank
3rd

Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Cuba
  • Mexico
100200300400500600201320182024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 174.65 million USD against 114.94 million USD in Cuba, a difference of 59.71 million USD.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Cuba's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 4th and Mexico ranks 3rd of 51 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$, Cuba or Mexico?
Mexico, at 174.65 million USD against 114.94 million USD in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Cuba and Mexico?
59.71 million USD, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mexico?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cuba and Mexico rank globally for forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Cuba ranks 4th and Mexico ranks 3rd of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
52 places, 635 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.