Kyrgyzstan vs Viet Nam: Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 11.99 million USD against 9.57 million USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.42 million USD.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 49 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.14 million USD | 21.96 million USD | 17.82 million USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 4.17 million USD | 16.26 million USD | 12.09 million USD | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$, Kyrgyzstan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 11.99 million USD against 9.57 million USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 2.42 million USD, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Viet Nam rank globally for forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 2nd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.