Mauritius vs Togo: Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$

Mauritius
3.93 million USD
in 2024
Togo
4.02 million USD
in 2018
Mauritius rank
30th
Togo rank
28th

Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$ over time

  • Mauritius
  • Togo
0246200920162024

How they compare

Togo currently reports 4.02 million USD against 3.93 million USD in Mauritius, a difference of 0.09 million USD.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 30th and Togo ranks 28th of 51 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$, Mauritius or Togo?
Togo, at 4.02 million USD against 3.93 million USD in Mauritius as of 2018.
What is the difference in forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$ between Mauritius and Togo?
0.09 million USD, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Togo?
7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
How do Mauritius and Togo rank globally for forestry, recurrent (central government expenditure) — value us$?
Mauritius ranks 30th and Togo ranks 28th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Forestry, Recurrent (central government expenditure) — Value US$
Unit
million USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
52 places, 635 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.