Bhutan vs Nicaragua: Freshwater Fish — Fat supply quantity
Freshwater Fish — Fat supply quantity over time
- Bhutan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 76.43 t against 69.98 t in Nicaragua, a difference of 6.45 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 123rd and Nicaragua ranks 125th of 164 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 71.01 t | 48.21 t | 22.8 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 74.86 t | 69.2 t | 5.66 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher freshwater fish — fat supply quantity, Bhutan or Nicaragua?
- Bhutan, at 76.43 t against 69.98 t in Nicaragua as of 2023.
- What is the difference in freshwater fish — fat supply quantity between Bhutan and Nicaragua?
- 6.45 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Nicaragua?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Nicaragua rank globally for freshwater fish — fat supply quantity?
- Bhutan ranks 123rd and Nicaragua ranks 125th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Freshwater Fish — Fat supply quantity (t). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.