Georgia vs Panama: Freshwater Fish — Fat supply quantity
Freshwater Fish — Fat supply quantity over time
- Georgia
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 236.18 t against 183.55 t in Georgia, a difference of 52.63 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Panama ahead.
Georgia ranks 118th and Panama ranks 115th of 182 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 174.78 t | 141.85 t | 32.93 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 186.7 t | 236.18 t | 49.48 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher freshwater fish — fat supply quantity, Georgia or Panama?
- Panama, at 236.18 t against 183.55 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in freshwater fish — fat supply quantity between Georgia and Panama?
- 52.63 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Panama?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Panama rank globally for freshwater fish — fat supply quantity?
- Georgia ranks 118th and Panama ranks 115th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Freshwater Fish — Fat supply quantity (t). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.