Costa Rica vs Poland: Freshwater Fish — Food
Freshwater Fish — Food over time
- Costa Rica
- Poland
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 36 1000 t against 35 1000 t in Poland, a difference of 1 1000 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Poland ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 59th and Poland ranks 60th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30.7 1000 t | 68.3 1000 t | 37.6 1000 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 36 1000 t | 35 1000 t | 1 1000 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher freshwater fish — food, Costa Rica or Poland?
- Costa Rica, at 36 1000 t against 35 1000 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in freshwater fish — food between Costa Rica and Poland?
- 1 1000 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Poland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Poland rank globally for freshwater fish — food?
- Costa Rica ranks 59th and Poland ranks 60th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Freshwater Fish — Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.