Ecuador vs Mauritania: Freshwater Fish — Production
Freshwater Fish — Production over time
- Ecuador
- Mauritania
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 16 1000 t against 15 1000 t in Mauritania, a difference of 1 1000 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 78th and Mauritania ranks 80th of 182 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.1 1000 t | 15 1000 t | 16.1 1000 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 16 1000 t | 15 1000 t | 1 1000 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher freshwater fish — production, Ecuador or Mauritania?
- Ecuador, at 16 1000 t against 15 1000 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in freshwater fish — production between Ecuador and Mauritania?
- 1 1000 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for freshwater fish — production?
- Ecuador ranks 78th and Mauritania ranks 80th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Freshwater Fish — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.