Chile vs Romania: Fuelwood — Energy consumption
Fuelwood — Energy consumption over time
- Chile
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 132,329 TJ against 118,456 TJ in Chile, a difference of 13,873 TJ.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 36th and Romania ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 131,912 TJ | 67,207 TJ | 64,705 TJ | Chile |
| 2000s | 166,851 TJ | 125,323 TJ | 41,528 TJ | Chile |
| 2010s | 139,101 TJ | 145,446 TJ | 6,345 TJ | Romania |
| 2020s | 100,907 TJ | 138,911 TJ | 38,005 TJ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy consumption, Chile or Romania?
- Romania, at 132,329 TJ against 118,456 TJ in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy consumption between Chile and Romania?
- 13,873 TJ, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Romania rank globally for fuelwood — energy consumption?
- Chile ranks 36th and Romania ranks 33rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.