Ecuador vs Estonia: Fuelwood — Energy consumption
Fuelwood — Energy consumption over time
- Ecuador
- Estonia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8,750 TJ against 8,204 TJ in Estonia, a difference of 546 TJ.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 115th and Estonia ranks 117th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18,637 TJ | 15,153 TJ | 3,484 TJ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 13,726 TJ | 14,874 TJ | 1,148 TJ | Estonia |
| 2010s | 11,309 TJ | 9,017 TJ | 2,292 TJ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 8,954 TJ | 6,828 TJ | 2,126 TJ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy consumption, Ecuador or Estonia?
- Ecuador, at 8,750 TJ against 8,204 TJ in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy consumption between Ecuador and Estonia?
- 546 TJ, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Estonia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Estonia rank globally for fuelwood — energy consumption?
- Ecuador ranks 115th and Estonia ranks 117th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.