Kiribati vs Malta: Fuelwood — Energy consumption
Fuelwood — Energy consumption over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 47.5 TJ against 36.66 TJ in Malta, a difference of 10.84 TJ.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 181st and Malta ranks 183rd of 215 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.99 TJ | 0 TJ | 45.99 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 46.61 TJ | 45.88 TJ | 0.731 TJ | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 46.87 TJ | 49.36 TJ | 2.49 TJ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy consumption, Kiribati or Malta?
- Kiribati, at 47.5 TJ against 36.66 TJ in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy consumption between Kiribati and Malta?
- 10.84 TJ, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for fuelwood — energy consumption?
- Kiribati ranks 181st and Malta ranks 183rd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.