Malawi vs Romania: Fuelwood — Energy consumption
Fuelwood — Energy consumption over time
- Malawi
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 132,329 TJ against 123,821 TJ in Malawi, a difference of 8,508 TJ.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 31st and Romania ranks 29th of 198 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63,299 TJ | 67,207 TJ | 3,908 TJ | Romania |
| 2000s | 78,218 TJ | 125,323 TJ | 47,106 TJ | Romania |
| 2010s | 104,241 TJ | 145,446 TJ | 41,205 TJ | Romania |
| 2020s | 119,750 TJ | 138,911 TJ | 19,162 TJ | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy consumption, Malawi or Romania?
- Romania, at 132,329 TJ against 123,821 TJ in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy consumption between Malawi and Romania?
- 8,508 TJ, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Romania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Romania rank globally for fuelwood — energy consumption?
- Malawi ranks 31st and Romania ranks 29th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.