Malaysia vs Uruguay: Fuelwood — Energy consumption
Fuelwood — Energy consumption over time
- Malaysia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 22,569 TJ against 20,778 TJ in Malaysia, a difference of 1,791 TJ.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 99th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30,969 TJ | 22,011 TJ | 8,958 TJ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 26,720 TJ | 20,067 TJ | 6,653 TJ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 22,243 TJ | 25,588 TJ | 3,345 TJ | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 20,953 TJ | 22,603 TJ | 1,650 TJ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy consumption, Malaysia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 22,569 TJ against 20,778 TJ in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy consumption between Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 1,791 TJ, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for fuelwood — energy consumption?
- Malaysia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 99th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.