Oceania vs Zimbabwe: Fuelwood — Energy consumption
Fuelwood — Energy consumption over time
- Oceania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 222,403 TJ against 144,540 TJ in Oceania, a difference of 77,863 TJ.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.5 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 31 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 116,223 TJ | 131,411 TJ | 15,188 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 140,381 TJ | 151,211 TJ | 10,830 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 157,877 TJ | 173,123 TJ | 15,246 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 143,986 TJ | 207,914 TJ | 63,928 TJ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy consumption, Oceania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 222,403 TJ against 144,540 TJ in Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy consumption between Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 77,863 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Oceania and Zimbabwe rank globally for fuelwood — energy consumption?
- Oceania ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 23rd of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.