Belarus vs Croatia: Fuelwood — Energy production
Fuelwood — Energy production over time
- Belarus
- Croatia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 67,238 TJ against 62,062 TJ in Croatia, a difference of 5,176 TJ.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Belarus ranks 68th and Croatia ranks 70th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Croatia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,414 TJ | 46,493 TJ | 27,079 TJ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 44,102 TJ | 48,541 TJ | 4,439 TJ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 63,933 TJ | 61,149 TJ | 2,785 TJ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 69,215 TJ | 64,707 TJ | 4,508 TJ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy production, Belarus or Croatia?
- Belarus, at 67,238 TJ against 62,062 TJ in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy production between Belarus and Croatia?
- 5,176 TJ, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for fuelwood — energy production?
- Belarus ranks 68th and Croatia ranks 70th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.