Oceania vs Zimbabwe: Fuelwood — Energy production
Fuelwood — Energy production over time
- Oceania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 233,559 TJ against 148,930 TJ in Oceania, a difference of 84,629 TJ.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Oceania ahead.
Oceania ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 43 regions.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oceania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 122,810 TJ | 132,655 TJ | 9,845 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 153,095 TJ | 154,943 TJ | 1,847 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 166,985 TJ | 183,866 TJ | 16,881 TJ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 150,898 TJ | 219,381 TJ | 68,483 TJ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fuelwood — energy production, Oceania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 233,559 TJ against 148,930 TJ in Oceania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fuelwood — energy production between Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 84,629 TJ, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Oceania and Zimbabwe rank globally for fuelwood — energy production?
- Oceania ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 29th of 43 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fuelwood — Energy production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.