Finland vs Zimbabwe: Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use

Finland
33 t
in 2019
Zimbabwe
32 t
in 2014
Finland rank
47th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use over time

  • Finland
  • Zimbabwe
255075100125150199020042019

How they compare

Finland currently reports 33 t against 32 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 73 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 73.57 t 78.71 t 5.14 t Zimbabwe
2010s 46.5 t 104.5 t 58 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fung & bact – dithiocarbamates — agricultural use, Finland or Zimbabwe?
Finland, at 33 t against 32 t in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
What is the difference in fung & bact – dithiocarbamates — agricultural use between Finland and Zimbabwe?
1 t, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Zimbabwe?
9 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2013.
How do Finland and Zimbabwe rank globally for fung & bact – dithiocarbamates — agricultural use?
Finland ranks 47th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Zimbabwe: Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-dithiocarbamates-agricultural-use/finland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-dithiocarbamates-agricultural-use/finland/zimbabwe/">Finland vs Zimbabwe: Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
76 places, 1,326 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).