Latvia vs Suriname: Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use

Latvia
15 t
in 2021
Suriname
18 t
in 2021
Latvia rank
55th
Suriname rank
53rd

Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use over time

  • Latvia
  • Suriname
050100150199120062021

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 18 t against 15 t in Latvia, a difference of 3 t.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Latvia ranks 55th and Suriname ranks 53rd of 73 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 52.33 t 16.33 t 36 t Latvia
2000s 41.75 t 23.25 t 18.5 t Latvia
2010s 20.44 t 37 t 16.56 t Suriname
2020s 15.5 t 18 t 2.5 t Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fung & bact – dithiocarbamates — agricultural use, Latvia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 18 t against 15 t in Latvia as of 2021.
What is the difference in fung & bact – dithiocarbamates — agricultural use between Latvia and Suriname?
3 t, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
22 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2021.
How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for fung & bact – dithiocarbamates — agricultural use?
Latvia ranks 55th and Suriname ranks 53rd of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Suriname: Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-dithiocarbamates-agricultural-use/latvia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-dithiocarbamates-agricultural-use/latvia/suriname/">Latvia vs Suriname: Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fung & Bact – Dithiocarbamates — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
76 places, 1,326 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).