Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Fung & Bact – Inorganics — Agricultural Use

Rwanda
16 t
in 2016
Zimbabwe
11 t
in 2014
Rwanda rank
52nd
Zimbabwe rank
53rd

Fung & Bact – Inorganics — Agricultural Use over time

  • Rwanda
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800199020032016

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 16 t against 11 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 5 t.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Rwanda ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 73 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 8 t 675 t 667 t Zimbabwe
2010s 26 t 270.33 t 244.33 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fung & bact – inorganics — agricultural use, Rwanda or Zimbabwe?
Rwanda, at 16 t against 11 t in Zimbabwe as of 2016.
What is the difference in fung & bact – inorganics — agricultural use between Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
5 t, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2014.
How do Rwanda and Zimbabwe rank globally for fung & bact – inorganics — agricultural use?
Rwanda ranks 52nd and Zimbabwe ranks 53rd of 73 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fung & Bact – Inorganics — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Fung & Bact – Inorganics — Agricultural Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-inorganics-agricultural-use/rwanda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/fung-and-bact-inorganics-agricultural-use/rwanda/zimbabwe/">Rwanda vs Zimbabwe: Fung & Bact – Inorganics — Agricultural Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fung & Bact – Inorganics — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
75 places, 1,258 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains statistics on the agricultural use of major pesticide groups and of relevant chemical families. Data are disseminated by country, with global coverage and are updated annually. The FAOSTAT Pesticides Use domain contains information on the use of major pesticide groups:1. Insecticides (Chlorinated hydrocarbons, Organo-phosphates, Carbamates-insecticides, Pyrethroids, Botanical and biological products and Others not elsewhere classified);2. Mineral Oils;3. Herbicides (Phenoxy hormone products, Triazines, Amides, Carbamates-herbicides, Dinitroanilines, Urea derivatives, Sulfonyl urea, Bipiridils, Uracil, Others not elsewhere classified);4. Fungicides and Bactericides (Inorganic, Dithiocarbamates, Benzimidazoles, Triazoles, Diazoles, Diazines, Morpholines, Others not elsewhere classified);5. Plant Growth Regulators;6. Rodenticides (Anti-coagulants, Cyanide Generators, Hypercalcaemics, Narcotics, Others not elsewhere classified);7. Other Pesticides NES (not elsewhere specified).