Canada vs Oceania: Gaseous biofuels — Energy consumption
Gaseous biofuels — Energy consumption over time
- Canada
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 1,395 TJ against 645 TJ in Canada, a difference of 750 TJ.
That makes Oceania's figure about 2.2 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Oceania ahead.
Canada ranks 23rd and Oceania ranks 22nd of 55 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and Oceania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 428 TJ | 1,174 TJ | 745.67 TJ | Oceania |
| 2010s | 2,639 TJ | 2,100 TJ | 538.59 TJ | Canada |
| 2020s | 2,533 TJ | 2,058 TJ | 475.14 TJ | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gaseous biofuels — energy consumption, Canada or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 1,395 TJ against 645 TJ in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gaseous biofuels — energy consumption between Canada and Oceania?
- 750 TJ, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Oceania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Oceania rank globally for gaseous biofuels — energy consumption?
- Canada ranks 23rd and Oceania ranks 22nd of 55 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gaseous biofuels — Energy consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain Bioenergy contains data on bioenergy use and bioenergy production, covering the following items: i) animal waste, ii) bagasse, iii) bio jet kerosene, iv) biodiesel, v) biogases, vi) biogasoline, vii) black liquor, viii) charcoal, ix) fuelwood, x) other liquid biofuels, xi) other vegetal material and residues.