Lithuania vs Uruguay: Goats — Stocks, per capita
Lithuania
0.0049 An per person
in 2023
Uruguay
0.0055 An per person
in 2023
Lithuania rank
141st
Uruguay rank
139th
Goats — Stocks, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0055 An per person against 0.0049 An per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0006 An per person.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
Lithuania ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 139th of 162 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0039 An per person | 0.0046 An per person | 0.0007 An per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0068 An per person | 0.0048 An per person | 0.0019 An per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.0049 An per person | 0.0052 An per person | 0.0003 An per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0052 An per person | 0.0054 An per person | 0.0002 An per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goats — stocks, per capita, Lithuania or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0055 An per person against 0.0049 An per person in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in goats — stocks, per capita between Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 0.0006 An per person, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Uruguay rank globally for goats — stocks, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 139th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Goats — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goats — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.