Luxembourg vs Suriname: Goats — Stocks, per capita
Luxembourg
0.0078 An per person
in 2022
Suriname
0.0065 An per person
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
130th
Suriname rank
133rd
Goats — Stocks, per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Suriname
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.0078 An per person against 0.0065 An per person in Suriname, a difference of 0.0013 An per person.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 130th and Suriname ranks 133rd of 162 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0039 An per person | 0.0123 An per person | 0.0084 An per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.009 An per person | 0.0075 An per person | 0.0015 An per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0.0078 An per person | 0.0069 An per person | 0.0009 An per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher goats — stocks, per capita, Luxembourg or Suriname?
- Luxembourg, at 0.0078 An per person against 0.0065 An per person in Suriname as of 2022.
- What is the difference in goats — stocks, per capita between Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 0.0013 An per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Luxembourg and Suriname rank globally for goats — stocks, per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 130th and Suriname ranks 133rd of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Goats — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Goats — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.