American Samoa vs Eswatini: Graphic papers — Import quantity, per capita
American Samoa
0.0034 t per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0036 t per person
in 2024
American Samoa rank
94th
Eswatini rank
92nd
Graphic papers — Import quantity, per capita over time
- American Samoa
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0.0036 t per person against 0.0034 t per person in American Samoa, a difference of 0.0002 t per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times American Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was American Samoa ahead.
American Samoa ranks 94th and Eswatini ranks 92nd of 184 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0023 t per person | 0.0036 t per person | 0.0013 t per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0013 t per person | 0.0028 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher graphic papers — import quantity, per capita, American Samoa or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 0.0036 t per person against 0.0034 t per person in American Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in graphic papers — import quantity, per capita between American Samoa and Eswatini?
- 0.0002 t per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Eswatini rank globally for graphic papers — import quantity, per capita?
- American Samoa ranks 94th and Eswatini ranks 92nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Graphic papers — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Graphic papers — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.