Belarus vs Eswatini: Graphic papers — Import value, per capita
Belarus
0.0037 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0.0037 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
102nd
Eswatini rank
104th
Graphic papers — Import value, per capita over time
- Belarus
- Eswatini
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0037 1000 USD per person against 0.0037 1000 USD per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 102nd and Eswatini ranks 104th of 184 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0079 1000 USD per person | 0.0044 1000 USD per person | 0.0035 1000 USD per person | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0042 1000 USD per person | 0.0034 1000 USD per person | 0.0008 1000 USD per person | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher graphic papers — import value, per capita, Belarus or Eswatini?
- Belarus, at 0.0037 1000 USD per person against 0.0037 1000 USD per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in graphic papers — import value, per capita between Belarus and Eswatini?
- 0 1000 USD per person, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for graphic papers — import value, per capita?
- Belarus ranks 102nd and Eswatini ranks 104th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Graphic papers — Import value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Graphic papers — Import value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.