China, Hong Kong SAR vs Pakistan: Graphic papers β€” Import value

China, Hong Kong SAR
136,987 1000 USD
in 2024
Pakistan
152,306 1000 USD
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
56th
Pakistan rank
54th

Graphic papers β€” Import value over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Pakistan
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 152,306 1000 USD against 136,987 1000 USD in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 15,319 1000 USD.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Pakistan ranks 54th of 233 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 12,882 1000 USD 2,301 1000 USD 10,581 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 58,749 1000 USD 15,638 1000 USD 43,112 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 180,378 1000 USD 46,795 1000 USD 133,583 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 778,778 1000 USD 75,081 1000 USD 703,697 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 712,375 1000 USD 102,787 1000 USD 609,588 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 435,517 1000 USD 178,559 1000 USD 256,958 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 161,650 1000 USD 158,283 1000 USD 3,368 1000 USD China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher graphic papers β€” import value, China, Hong Kong SAR or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 152,306 1000 USD against 136,987 1000 USD in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in graphic papers β€” import value between China, Hong Kong SAR and Pakistan?
15,319 1000 USD, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Pakistan?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Pakistan rank globally for graphic papers β€” import value?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Pakistan ranks 54th of 233 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Graphic papers β€” Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Pakistan: Graphic papers β€” Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/graphic-papers-import-value/china-hong-kong-sar/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/graphic-papers-import-value/china-hong-kong-sar/pakistan/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Pakistan: Graphic papers β€” Import value</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Graphic papers β€” Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
266 places, 13,107 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

The database contains data on the production and trade in roundwood and in primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world.The main types of primary forest products included in this database are roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further and defined in the Joint Forest Sector Questionnaire (JFSQ) (https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en). The database contains details of the following topics: - roundwood removals (production) by coniferous and non-coniferous wood and assortments, - production and trade in industrial roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, wood charcoal, pulp, paper and paperboard, and other products. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en