Armenia vs Coimbra: Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste

Armenia
0.13 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2024
Coimbra
0.08 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent
in 2024
Armenia rank
1st
Coimbra rank
4th

Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste over time

  • Armenia
  • Coimbra
0.040.060.080.10.120.14199020072024

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0.13 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent against 0.08 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent in Coimbra, a difference of 0.05 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.6 times Coimbra's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Coimbra ahead.

Armenia ranks 1st and Coimbra ranks 4th of 2 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Coimbra in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Coimbra Difference Ahead
1990s 0.074 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.076 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.002 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent Coimbra
2000s 0.095 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.091 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.004 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent Armenia
2010s 0.113 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.079 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.034 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent Armenia
2020s 0.128 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.08 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent 0.048 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher greenhouse gas emissions - cities and fuas — ghg emissions from waste, Armenia or Coimbra?
Armenia, at 0.13 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent against 0.08 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent in Coimbra as of 2024.
What is the difference in greenhouse gas emissions - cities and fuas — ghg emissions from waste between Armenia and Coimbra?
0.05 Tonnes of CO2-equivalent, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Coimbra?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Coimbra rank globally for greenhouse gas emissions - cities and fuas — ghg emissions from waste?
Armenia ranks 1st and Coimbra ranks 4th of 2 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Coimbra: Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/greenhouse-gas-emissions-cities-and-fuas-ghg-emissions-from-waste/armenia/coimbra/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/greenhouse-gas-emissions-cities-and-fuas-ghg-emissions-from-waste/armenia/coimbra/">Armenia vs Coimbra: Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs — GHG emissions from waste
Unit
Tonnes of CO2-equivalent
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
1,326 places, 46,410 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides statistics on greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) and Cities. Data sources and methodology GHG emissions at the subnational level are estimated using the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) version 8.0 developed by the European Commission Joint Research Centre and the Internation Energy Agency (EC JRC/IEA, 2023). EDGAR provides annual sector-specific grid maps for four GHGs (carbon dioxide or CO2, methane or CH4, nitrous oxide or N2O and fluorinated gases or F-gases) at a 0.1° spatial resolution (approximately 11 km). The different sectors covered are: Energy, Industry, Transport, Building, Agriculture, Waste. Emissions from land use and land cover change are not included. In EDGAR, national GHG emissions are disaggregated at subnational level by using subsector-specific geospatial proxies. GHG emissions are expressed in CO2 equivalents using 100-year global warming potential from the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (AR5), i.e. 28 for CH4 and 265 for N2O. EDGAR is used to ensure global comparability, harmonised methods across countries, and complete subnational coverage, which is not always provided in national reporting. These subnational estimates may differ from official subnational statistics. Differences may arise from variations in methodologies, particularly the use of top down spatial downscaling in EDGAR versus bottom up activity based approaches in official inventories, as well as the choice and availability of spatial proxies used to allocate emissions geographically. Defining FUAs and cities The OECD, in cooperation with the EU, has developed a harmonised definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) to capture the economic and functional reach of cities based on daily commuting patterns (OECD, 2012). FUAs consist of: A city – defined by urban centres in the degree of urbanisation, adapted to the closest local administrative units to define a city. A commuting zone – including all local areas where at least 15% of employed residents work in the city. The delineation process includes: Assigning municipalities surrounded by a single FUA to that FUA. Excluding non-contiguous municipalities. The definition identifies 1 285 FUAs and 1 402 cities in all OECD member countries except Costa Rica and three accession countries. Cite this dataset OECD Regions, cities and local areas database (Greenhouse gas emissions - Cities and FUAs), http://oe.cd/geostats Further information OECD Local Data Portal OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance For questions and/or comments, please email CitiesStat@oecd.org