Germany vs Poland: Gross Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value

Germany
442,450 million SLC
in 2022
Poland
329,068 million SLC
in 2020
Germany rank
5th
Poland rank
7th

Gross Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value over time

  • Germany
  • Poland
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199520082022

How they compare

Germany currently reports 442,450 million SLC against 329,068 million SLC in Poland, a difference of 113,382 million SLC.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 5th and Poland ranks 7th of 26 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 266,605 million SLC 248,430 million SLC 18,175 million SLC Germany
2010s 327,836 million SLC 284,446 million SLC 43,391 million SLC Germany
2020s 367,875 million SLC 329,068 million SLC 38,807 million SLC Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital stocks (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value, Germany or Poland?
Germany, at 442,450 million SLC against 329,068 million SLC in Poland as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross capital stocks (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value between Germany and Poland?
113,382 million SLC, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Poland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Germany and Poland rank globally for gross capital stocks (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value?
Germany ranks 5th and Poland ranks 7th of 26 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Poland: Gross Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-stocks-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/germany/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-stocks-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local-currency/germany/poland/">Germany vs Poland: Gross Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Capital Stocks (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
26 places, 670 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.