Australia and New Zealand vs Libya: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)

Australia and New Zealand
1.21
in 2023
Libya
1.11
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
34th
Libya rank
37th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Libya
00.511.52199520092023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 1.21 against 1.11 in Libya, a difference of 0.1.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Libya ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th and Libya ranks 37th of 182 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 1.46 1.94 0.4793 Libya
2000s 1.5 0.5935 0.9036 Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1.14 0.5549 0.581 Australia and New Zealand
2020s 1.14 0.9899 0.1546 Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing), Australia and New Zealand or Libya?
Australia and New Zealand, at 1.21 against 1.11 in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing) between Australia and New Zealand and Libya?
0.1, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Libya?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Libya rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 34th and Libya ranks 37th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Agriculture orientation index US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Libya: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-agriculture-orientation-4/australia-and-new-zealand/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-agriculture-orientation-4/australia-and-new-zealand/libya/">Australia and New Zealand vs Libya: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Agriculture orientation index US$, 2015 prices
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
228 places, 6,512 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.