Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)

Central African Republic
18,748 million SLC
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
19,708 million SLC
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
73rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
71st

Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Equatorial Guinea
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199520092023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 19,708 million SLC against 18,748 million SLC in Central African Republic, a difference of 960 million SLC.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 73rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 71st of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 9,449 million SLC 760.57 million SLC 8,689 million SLC Central African Republic
2000s 10,517 million SLC 8,235 million SLC 2,282 million SLC Central African Republic
2010s 13,876 million SLC 16,773 million SLC 2,897 million SLC Equatorial Guinea
2020s 16,732 million SLC 19,220 million SLC 2,489 million SLC Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing), Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 19,708 million SLC against 18,748 million SLC in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing) between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
960 million SLC, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing)?
Central African Republic ranks 73rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 71st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local/central-african-republic/equatorial-guinea/">Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
194 places, 5,531 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.